Economic Public - Corporate Communications - Its Importance During an Economic Crisis

Introduction

According to theories about recession, it turns out to be financial stagnation. Money stops flowing as it must to make our economy healthy. Then folks get scared. Fears spread to others. We stop spending. Everyone waits for someone else to start spending again. The media capitalize on our fears and punch them up. Money flow drops further. Cash gets scarce. People freeze up. The economy slows.

But there is one good thing about economic recession. It reminds us how interconnected we are.

In some economic theories, the antidote is government injection of cash to prime our economic pump. That's what the current Economic Stimulus Payment program is attempting. The idea is to trigger a spending spree in America, to fight a form of fear with a form of greed. America is the land of "me first." This could be a reason to get cynical. But we can choose not to go there.

Many Americans are deciding what they'll do with their ESP money. Much of it seems destined to flow straight into the coffers of already-rich big companies. But the pump doesn't care how it gets primed. The cash injection theory will be tested once again however the money is spent. Historically, cash injection sometimes works, temporarily. Sometimes not. So let's get our minds out of this little money box. Isn't it really more about our fear than about money?

What would happen if large numbers of people had the courage to spend some of their ESP on a worthy cause rather than blowing it all on some consumerism binge, or even on meeting their legitimate self-centered needs? Economic recovery would then be about renewing our connection to others or maybe about the health of a planet we depend on. It wouldn't just be about our scared selves anymore and about what we might lose. It would become helping people and making things better where we live.

Then we would answer fear not with greed, but with an opening of the heart.

A Practical Response

This is a professionally designed event production plan that anyone can use to produce a brief publicity event which will stimulate donations to worthy causes from recipients of the US Government's Economic Stimulus Payments. If you follow this plan faithfully, your event will have quality, professionalism, and effect equivalent to commercial grade, agency-designed publicity.

An independent marketing professional developed this event model as a public service, following a carefully devised approach. The scope and cost have been minimized to eliminate barriers. This event can be produced repeatedly, as often as desired, in any suitable location and conditions, for any audience within the intended market niche.

Everything required to produce the donation event is contained within this document, which is available as a FREE download online. The download link is listed at the end.

Vision

To end the ESP payout period with a significant portion of the total funds routed to worthy causes.

Mission

* To raise awareness of donation to worthy causes as a worthwhile and personally rewarding response to the ESP.

* To position ESP donation as a desirable, positive action that helps make the world a better place however the donor's beliefs and choices may be aligned.

* To stimulate immediate ESP donations and also champion repetitions of this event as a public service.

Objectives

First, to seed a nationwide, event-based, social trend to redirect ESP funds into worthy causes. Second, to stimulate individual donations on a small scale each time the event is staged.

Market Niche

Everyone receiving Economic Stimulus Payments from the US Government.

Method

A group of peers stands together in a meeting and puts money where their hearts are. This action makes an impression, gives an example, and inspires imitation. Witnessing donations from peers stimulates an audience to consider responding with similar actions. Producing this event is easy, simple, tangible, immediate, and cost-free. It has potential to 'go viral,' in a low-tech, interpersonal way, through long-established networks of business people who are committed to community service almost beyond belief.

Discussion

People can be opinionated, emotional, and even downright touchy about money in general and donation in particular. Therefore, it's just as important to not do the wrong things as it is to do the right things -- if this event is to produce the intended effect. It's essential to follow a non-sectarian and non-partisan protocol. It's critical to manage the event to avoid any hint of negativity around the audience's possible generosity.

Most folks in the audience will have their own idea of who should get their donation and what the amount should be. It's best to keep the audience feeling comfortable in thinking about their own favorite recipient, throughout. For best effect, carefully avoid any hint of favoritism. If you want to persuade people to donate to some cause you personally believe in, please know this event is not designed for that purpose.

It's about how to move money from a specific source, the ESP. It's not about what the money's destination 'should be.' The root concept is to respect and honor each potential donor's free choice of a worthy cause and also their personal choices about what to donate and how much. With this in mind, event presenters should not champion any specific recipient or try to tell donors what they should give or how much.

The object is to move the audience forward in their generosity to take action, whatever form that takes and whatever recipient the donation reaches. If you feel you must engage event participants about specific recipients, please arrange to meet with them after the event. Always consider your hosts, who have to live with the consequences of what you say and do at their podium, including any member backlash you might trigger through an appearance of favoritism.

Pre-Event Preparation

1. Contact the leaders of your local service club chapters, like Rotary International, Kiwanis, Soroptimists, etc., and Chamber of Commerce leadership. Enlist them into this event production concept. Share this plan with them. Ask if the media can attend. Secure brief spots on their meeting agendas of 5 minutes or so. The sooner the better but you'll need a little time to get ready.

2. Recruit a few friends to donate and collaborate in the event. Engage them in an open discussion of what they think of the ESP and ask how they plan to spend their ESP money. Share your own ideas and this document with them. Explain to them in your own words why you think this event is a good idea and ask them to join with you in a couple hours of public service. Mention that they can choose their recipient and any amount that works for them, and that the donations will be in sealed envelopes.

Pick several people who are fully aligned with this process and its principles and design. Your collaborators must agree this event will not be a competitive or comparative situation, and most of all, that it's not a debate. Avoid anyone who can't be trusted to follow this plan explicitly. Basically, your group will act out a tiny stage play with scripted dialog.

You need at least 3 but probably not more than 5 or 6 collaborators. Have each collaborator choose their donation recipient and prepare their donation in a stamped, addressed envelope. Any required routing or identification information should be included. The amount is entirely up to the donor. Each should also prepare a brief, one-sentence declaration saying why they chose that specific recipient. Their statements should not contain any comparative language or references to donation amounts.

3. Contact the media by issuing a news release. Use the news release template at the end of this document. All you have to do is fill in the blanks. Distribute it to all local media via email. Make sure you reach the appropriate contacts for breaking news.

Press Release Note -- If you can reach news editors by phone before the press release goes out and briefly pitch them on this event idea's newsworthiness, this can help acceptance. However, it would be bad form to call editors after the news release goes out to ask if it was received -- unless you have contacted them in advance.

4. Attend the service club meetings as scheduled. Have your collaborators present. Have each of them bring their donation envelope. Have each collaborator prepared to make their statement.

Event Sequence

It's important that this event be carried off smoothly, yet briskly and efficiently, and that the podium be vacated within the time limit promised. Respect your host's agenda.

1. You (the Presenter) take the podium when introduced.

2. Yo thank the club leadership and audience.

3. You explain briefly what the event is all about by reading this short script, without embellishment. If you memorize it, so much the better --

"These days, many Americans are considering how they'll spend our Government's Economic Stimulus Payments. Some may use their ESP money to cover necessities. Others may be planning to spend their ESP on indulgences.

"For me and a group of friends present here, the ESP has a different meaning. Will my collaborators now please stand with me?

[Pause until all are standing]

"We've decided our highest and best use of this 'federal mad money' is to donate some or all of it to a worthy cause. We've each picked a favorite recipient who we think will help make the world a better place.

"However the ESP's are spent, whether they slow the recession or not, we feel better about routing some of this money through worthy causes. We're hoping others will consider ESP donation as an alternative to spending their ESP money only for self-benefit.

"My friends have prepared their ESP donations for mailing. I'm accepting the envelopes on behalf of their recipients, symbolically. After this meeting I'll mail them off, along with my own.

"My friends will now come to the podium and hand me their donation envelopes and share with you who they chose to receive their donation, and why."

4. Your collaborators all come to the podium. They stand together around you, facing the audience. You ask them each, one by one, to announce who they chose as recipient. They each hand their envelope to you and respond in a one or two sentence statement that says only who the recipient is and why they chose that recipient to receive their donation.

Note well -- The persuasive impact of this event arises much more from action than from words. It's critical that none of your collaborators pontificate, digress into a political speech, make a partisan statement, give a comparison of worthy causes, or anything like that.

5. When the envelopes are all collected and all the collaborators have spoken, you announce --

"I will mail these donations out later today. If anyone here is interested in producing an event like this themselves, there is a professionally designed event production plan available online, free. See me after the meeting and I'll provide the link."

6. You thank the hosts and audience.

7. Everyone in your group returns to their seats.

8. You mail out the donations, as promised, before the end of the day.

9. You sit out the meeting and make yourself available after it concludes to talk with anyone who approaches you with questions or comments. Expect the press to seek you out if they attend. Continue to follow the nonpartisan, non-denominational guidelines when you answer questions. It would help to have a few copies of this plan to hand out to folks who might wish to produce it again themselves. Or you could write the link to it on a business card for them.

Closing Comments

Let me acknowledge Annie Kirshbaum, a young friend of a friend, and a special education teacher in the Chicago area. Annie's frustration and anger about the Government's ESP program, and the way she morphed those emotions into a positive response, inspired me to create this event design, give it away, and attempt a viral deployment. I hope Annie likes what she inspired and that she might even work with it herself.

Annie and friends asked for my help to publicize the notion of spending some ESP money as a donation to a worthy cause rather than blowing it. I'm grateful her idea reached me because it's inspiring to encounter, if only by email, a twenty-something who acts on behalf of others with so much compassion and provides such inspiration to reach out and help someone or something.

Nothing I ever bought for myself ever left me with such a glow of inner satisfaction as writing this project. As I produce some ESP donation events myself, that will probably get even better.

I also hope everyone who picks this up gets a charge from working with these mini-events. Thank you for joining with me in taking an idea on the road to see how much good can come from it. The complete event plan can be accessed online FREE. Follow the link given in the resource section at the end of this article.

Economic Public - Labor Unions vs Management = Economic Weapons

Throughout this essay, I will describe the economic weapons available to employers and unions during negotiations. For each, I will explain how the weapon is designed to exert pressure on the other party and the advantages and disadvantages of each. Bear in mind, I will be concentrating on private sector employees covered by the NLRA. I will try to make distinctions that would apply to public sector and non-NLRA covered workers as I go along.
Employers' economic weapons consist of lockout; plant closings, and other forms of economic pressure.

Although lockout is a primary economic weapon utilized by employers; it is rarely used. According to a class handout, an employer may lock out its employees in order to bring economic pressure on a union. For example, an employer may lockout offensively, i.e., to put economic pressure on the union to accede to its bargaining demands. In other words, a theater could lockout unionized workers in a preemptive maneuver during a slow season to outmaneuver the possibility of the union striking during its busiest season to exert its pressure on the theater. Thus, the theater hopes to resolve the labor issue, to their advantage, before the busy season (e.g. Christmas season).
Lockout is consisted of other components, besides the generalized aspect described in the preceding paragraph, such as: replacements; pre-impasse lockouts, and partial lockouts. An employer can hire temporary replacements during a lockout but it is not allowed to hire permanent replacements. Pre-impasse lockouts are lockouts implemented before an impasse (a deadlock in negotiations).

On the other hand,
partial lockouts arise from the act of an employer which, although allowing employees to work normal hours of work, withdraws the provision of other contractual obligations such as the opportunity to work overtime or the payment of penal rates.are lockouts rendered in a partial manner (www2.stats.govt.nz).

Both pre-impasse lockouts and partial lockouts are legal as long as they are not
in support of a bad faith bargaining position; to discourage union activity; to aid ULPs, and etc. If not, they would be unlawful and would be disadvantageous to the employer.
Like lockouts, an employer may use a plant closing as an economic tool to exert pressure on a union. A plant closing can be divided into three major parts: a complete closing; a partial closing, and a runaway shop. The advantage of a complete closing is that an employer may completely cease its operations, even if it is motivated exclusively and admittedly by anti-union animus. However, the employer may be obligated to bargain over the effects of the closure.
A partial closing (as the name implies) is legal unless it can be proven that the employer intended to "chill" unionization. If not, remedies would be applied to reopen the plant or other remedies may be provided.

As for a runaway shop, it is defined as when the employer transfers the work from one plant to another existing plant or opens a new plant to replace the closed one. It also applies within a plant, where work is transferred from one department or group of workers to another. The same is true if the work is subcontracted out to an "alter ego" employer. The advantage and the disadvantage of a runaway shop is that although the NLRB considered the transfer of work to be inherently destructive (disadvantage) of employee rights, that theory was later rejected (advantage) in the absence of a specific contractual prohibition. In other words, an employer can claim that economic necessity dictated that he/she applies the runaway shop to avoid an unduly burdensome economic situation.

Other forms of economic pressure include corporate campaign; publicity, and political pressure. These forms of economic pressure are advantageous as long as they toe the line of the law. For example, an employer shouldn't undermine the NLRA during its corporate campaign and publicity, and it shouldn't break the law when applying political pressure (stay away from bribing officials).
To counter employers' inherent (as owner/management) upper hand in negotiations and his/her economic weapons, unions employ economic weapons such as strikes and picket lines. Strikes can be divided into economic strikes; ULP strikes; secondary strikes, and unprotected strikes.
First, economic strikes are a strike usually used to coerce an employer to agree to a raise, for example. The disadvantage of an economic raise is that striking workers can be permanently replaced after 12 months on strike. For the preceding reason, ULP strikes are used, for the most part, since the employer cannot legally replace strikers with permanent replacements after a year of striking. Regardless, ULP strikers have to avoid to striking against a third party to influence their negotiations because a secondary strike is illegal - an unprotected strike.

Other unprotected strikes that a ULP striker has to avoid are failure to provide 8(d), (g) notice; disloyalty or violence; striking for an illegal object; partial or intermittent strikes; slowdowns, and sit ins. Let's begin with the 8(d), (g) notice; it's a notice that has to be provided during a certain time frame to avoid a strike or picketing from gaining an unprotected status. Likewise, a striker defaming an employer without a logical connection to the strike or perpetrating violence are unprotected. For example, a striker cannot say an employer's product is of a low quality without implying its low quality is caused by inexperienced/untrained temporary replacements thus jeopardizing safety.

Similarly, strikers cannot strike to compel an employer to agree to an illegal or permissive subject of bargaining otherwise known as striking for an illegal object. Unlike partial lockouts, partial or intermittent strikes are not protected. In the same vein, slowdowns and sit ins are not protected, too. The employer reserved the right to discharge unprotected strikers.

Besides strikes, unions use picketing as a tactic, also. For example, a union may picket an employer to gain recognition. However, a union has to be careful not to create the intent or effect of preventing individuals employed by other entities from ceasing to provide services to the picketed employer. For example, they will be considered unprotected if they preclude the making or picking up of deliveries by third parties. Thus, the employer can have the picketing union removed, or severely restricted, or sanctioned in other ways. However, if the delivery employees (not employed by the employer) refuse to cross the picket line (hence 'crossing picket lines at other employers') in support of the picketers is a different story. The NLRB and the Courts would weigh the relative interests of the employer in replacing the employee and the interest of the employee in honoring a picket line.

As I mentioned in the introductory paragraph, there are exceptions to the rule in regard to the employment of economic weapons by both employers and unions. For example, there are different rules for unions representing public employees (e.g., NYPD unions cannot legally strike) and private employees (e.g., nurses and doctors are legally hindered from striking, too), respectively. In addition, secondary boycotts are legal and protected for agricultural workers as per the Act regulating agricultural unions while secondary boycotts like secondary strikes by NLRA covered workers are unprotected.

In conclusion, I described the economic weapons available to employers and unions during negotiations. For each, I explained how the weapon is designed to exert pressure on the other party and the advantages and disadvantages of each. Although I concentrated on private sector employees covered by the NLRA, I endeavored to make distinctions that would apply to public sector and non-NLRA covered workers throughout the essay.

Economic Public - Understanding YOUR Economic Alternatives With an Education in Alternative Economics

In the recent past we looked to professionals of the financial planning industry to help us devise a more informed plan that would take us comfortably into our retirement years. Unfortunately, the procedures and methods that most typical financial planners follow and suggest have become archaic and antiquated (even self-serving). Too often, this misguidance has led to diminishing returns instead of the large gains usually promised. As a result, and for good reason, we as a public have lost our faith in these so-called professionals and have lost the desire to save or invest for the future. Read the book, "Where are the Customers' yatchs?" by Fred Schwed Jr.

To further the challenge, Social Security has published their prediction to be bankrupt (See your yearly Social Security statement page 1 top right paragraph) and the government is screaming at the public through almost every form of media to establish a personal financial plan that would not include government assistance. In other words, "you are on your own!"

Without understanding your economic alternatives or having a personal system of financial growth, the effects of social heredity during demographic and economic transition has proven to be devastating financially for most.

In other words it's becoming more and more difficult to achieve any level of financial security if we make our financial decisions based on our inherited perceptions. As time goes on things change and the economic climate we live in changes too. Things are changing more rapidly now than ever before. Unrecognized changes expand the information gap between our perceptions and reality. The decisions we make have their result determined by how close, or far, our perceptions are to the reality of the world we live in.

For instance, did you know:

1. You can Self Direct IRA's, 401K's and other tax deferred retirement plans and use those funds to leverage acquisition of high performing real estate and watch your assets grow unhindered by taxation.
2. If you have stocks bonds or mutual funds you can often Pledge (Not Borrow) that asset as a down payment on real estate but never take it out of the funds they are in. In effect you can double dip!
3. Banks make money through something called Arbitrage and so can you.
4. You have hidden assets you didn't know you had. In fact you have all the financial assets you need to achieve any goal you desire.
5. The Return On Investment for Home Equity is Zero.
6. The Effective Rate you are paying on a fixed rate mortgage changes from one year to the next.
7. Of the ways that the financial planning industry are allowed to report the performance of your investments under their management at least 9 of the 13 can make it look like you are getting a better return than you are. Sometimes you are actually losing money when they report a gain.

Through knowledge of truths like this, and much more, you can turn the financial table in your favor.

To achieve your own goals and dreams (which may be just a comfortable retirement) you must become knowledgeable and sophisticated about how the money game works, now, and stay that way through fast paced changes. This requires an education process that may rattle your conventional thinking and an on going affiliation with a trusted source of new and current information as well as opportunities to keep you on the cutting edge. Finally you need to learn to apply a new systematic process that works and keeps working; Because all the knowledge in the world won't get you anywhere without its application.

The principles of what is becoming known as Alternative Economics are critical in developing a successful personal system of financial growth. Alternative Economics is being called by some experts the solution to a failing financial plan in America and the economic doctrine of our era.

Alternative Economics was first introduced to the public through local investor clubs of the national investor group as a personal system of financial growth and an emerging industry by the National Strategic Investment Corporation (NSIC) in February 2005.

Founders of NSIC recognized growing financial disparity in homes on a national level due to inefficient financial planning traditions, a failing social security system and mismanaged or impotent government and corporate retirement programs that overlook many beneficial alternatives.

This disparity has reached a climax as the public is encouraged to take charge of its own financial future. The challenge to this solution lies in the progressively fast changing economic climate of this country caused by the effects of rapid technology growth among other major changes and events. The national education system can not keep up with these changes therefore leaving the public to make financial decisions based on perception and not reality. Financial decisions made with the old or just inaccurate information of perception yield less than desirable results and extinguish motivation of savings or investment activity. As a result less than 1% of this nation's household income is currently being invested in any kind of retirement or financial plan.

Alternative Economics is an answer to the call to the American public being shouted by top officials from every political party of the federal government to plan our own financial future. The message is clear, "the government will not be able to support us as we get older".

The "Savings Are Vital to Everyone's Retirement Act of 1997" (SAVER) was enacted on November 20, 1997. The purpose of the SAVER Act is to advance the publics knowledge and understanding of the importance of retirement savings. The Act directs the Secretary of Labor to take action in four general areas:

1. To maintain an ongoing program of outreach to the public to effectively promote retirement income savings;

2. To disseminate specific educational materials related to retirement savings and the principles of saving and investment;

3. To establish a web site as a means to disseminate these materials, and

4. To convene these National Summits on Retirement Savings.

In 2006 this was the objective of the National Summit of Retirement Savings taken right from the DOL web site located at the Department of Labor web site listed in the resources section below.

National Summit Objectives

1. Advance the publics knowledge and understanding of retirement savings and its critical importance to the future well-being of workers and their families.

2. Facilitate the development of a broad-based, public education program to encourage and enhance individual commitment to a personal retirement savings strategy.

3. Develop recommendations for additional research, reforms and action in the field of private pensions and individual retirement savings.

Alternative Economics fulfills all three of these objectives. But why is our savings so important to the federal government? The answer is two fold:

1. The productivity of this nation and therefore the health of its economy are directly related to the savings habit of its people.

2. Based on current savings habits in America the majority of future generations will not have the ability to retire or even support themselves on their own resources.

Coupled together, these two effects of the current savings habit of the American people could result in an unrecoverable condition and even a collapse in our national economy.

"Left uninformed, ambition is paralyzed by fear of the unknown. Opportunities go unrecognized and our dreams of a prosperous future fade away into excuses."

- Steven Hettema-

You may be asking yourself, "What is Alternative Economics"? To answer this lets start by telling you what its not.

Alternative Economics is not about stocks, bonds or mutual funds. Our corporate retirement plans, pensions plans, 401ks and IRAs are all invested in stocks, bonds and mutual funds. Let's face it, we've all seen or experienced the poor performance of these traditional investment classes. We'll talk in more detail in future articles about why we believe these investments are yielding such disappointing results. We'll also discuss how Alternative Economics will solve this problem on a personal level for anyone who actively applies the methods and principles it suggested. But for now let's keep the conversation a little broader in scope.

As a country, we've lost faith in these investment tools and are no longer motivated to save or plan for the future in the manner that we used too. This is evidenced by the fact that Americans save or invest less than 1% of our income. Some believe this is just because we are less disciplined today or we just don't care any more. Suggestions have been made that we are entering a new economic era lead by an irresponsible generation with an immediate gratification mindset. These explanations blame this depleted savings habit of our nation on the actions of the people and not the cause for these actions or lack thereof.

The American people of this generation are not stupid; we are simply reacting to our common sense...Why engage in a plan that we know is failing for so many? After all, discipline comes from motivation and motivation comes from faith in an action that will yield a desired result. We just don't believe anymore in the traditional financial plan which relies (for the most part) on the performance of stocks, bonds and mutual funds. What we need are better alternatives.

Alternative Economics is also not reliant on your frugality. Most Americans are under the perception that growing assets and/or investing are only possible at the price of significant lifestyle sacrifice. It's no wonder people think this way, listen to what Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke was quoted saying:

"Unless the current generation is willing to sacrifice, by cutting consumption or increasing savings, future generations could face a heavier reduction in living standards."

"We can mitigate the adverse effect of the aging population on future generations, but only by forgoing consumption or leisure today. As the population ages, the nation must choose among higher taxes, fewer government programs, cuts in Social Security and Medicare, a higher deficit or some combination of those options."

USA TODAY 10/05/2006, by Sue Kirchhoff

Does Ben understand what he is saying? Doesn't consumer consumption affect the health of the economy? Of course it does! Spending less to put more in savings or afford a higher social security tax is not a solution. Sorry Ben! People need alternatives that will allow them to keep spending (maintain or improve lifestyle now) while growing assets for their future at the same time.

The reality of this perception, left to us by the media, our political leaders and our heredity, makes more understandable the lack of motivation Americans have to save or invest in a conventional manner. Think about it, who in their right mind would be motivated by this financial plan?

Take money from your current budget, sacrificing lifestyle now, to save or invest for your future in a system that, based on past performance and future projections, will leave you with a retirement savings that won't even support the reduced lifestyle you endured to make a better one.

With that kind of outlook, no wonder we are more apt to say, "Spend it while you can enjoy it and hope for the best at retirement". Even though that's not a plan it makes more sense than the traditional option described above.

The concepts of Alternative Economics deal with the necessity of asset accumulation without requiring or even consideration of frugality.

Finally, Alternative Economics is not reliant on corporate pension plans or government managed retirement programs such as Social Security.

Economic Public - Everyone Should Promote Free Markets and Sound Economic Public Policy

Most Americans do not concern themselves with economic matters, and they leave the decision-making up to the politicians and other folks that they feel are better suited than them, who better understand the issues at hand. Nevertheless, it is important for all citizens in the United States to learn a little bit about economics and understand how our business cycles work, our banking system works, how regulations work, and how a for-profit enterprise runs.

It makes sense to have a little bit of knowledge in both micro and macro economics. You see, everyone should promote free markets and sound economic public policy, and yet, there are far too many people that speak up even though they know when something is wrong.

For instance the huge bailouts for General Motors and Chrysler where all the money went to the unions that actually caused the problem in the first place and made those companies very unprofitable over a long period of time. The union stranglehold prevented the companies from competing, and yet it was the taxpayers they bailed out the companies, which then gave the money to the unions so that they would go way and the companies could file for bankruptcy without interference or political backlash.

Obviously, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that this is a bunch of nonsense. But if people do not speak up, we are going to see more bad decisions being made with our taxpayer's money at the hands of the government interfering in private enterprise far into the future. It's really up to all of us, so, please consider all this.

Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy for economic-public2010.blogspot.com

If you require any more information or have any questions about our privacy policy, please feel free to contact us by email at syams.sul@gmail.com.

At economic-public2010.blogspot.com, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us. This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by economic-public2010.blogspot.com and how it is used.

Log Files
Like many other Web sites, economic-public2010.blogspot.com makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol ( IP ) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider ( ISP ), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user’s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons
economic-public2010.blogspot.com does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie
.:: Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on economic-public2010.blogspot.com.
.:: Google's use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to economic-public2010.blogspot.com and other sites on the Internet.
.:: Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html

Some of our advertising partners may use cookies and web beacons on our site. Our advertising partners include ....
Google Adsense


These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on economic-public2010.blogspot.com send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

economic-public2010.blogspot.com has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. economic-public2010.blogspot.com's privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browsers' respective websites.

Home Sales up in Most of Washington County

Hurricane and LaVerkin are the only areas of Washington County experiencing year-over-year declines in residential housing sales said Allan Carter, director of developer services for Southern Utah Title Company. From January to September, the Hurricane and LaVerkin area logged 430 home sales, representing a noticeable drop from the same period in 2009 when the area recorded 472 transactions, according to data compiled by Southern Utah Title Company. In contrast, 621 homes in western St. George were sold from January to September, an increase of 62 sales when compared with 2009 figures. The Spectrum

Crucial river road’s collapse gives Moab economy jitters

Grand County and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management are scrambling to find emergency federal funds to rebuild the Mineral Bottom Road, which was washed out earlier this year. The road is an important river-running link and mountain bike route in Grand County. They applied to the Federal Highway Administration for emergency aid of $1.8 million to $2.5 million, and Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah, sent the agency a letter backing the bid.

Highway officials have said the road, maintained by the county but crossing federal land, qualifies for an emergency funding program to aid federal highways. They haven’t yet approved the application, though. The BLM estimates the road supports 87 jobs and about $1.9 million in annual recreation sales. Salt Lake Tribune